At first sight, SeniorCrossdress.com might look like a legitimate dating website, especially to those who do not have the necessary experience to quickly detect a possible danger. The landing page presents itself with a modern and appealing design. It provides the reader with a lot of engaging content to promote the services available in the member's area.
The user is reassured that their personal details will never be shared with anyone and that their bank statement will never show the domain name. Respect for privacy is an important aspect for everyone who decides to sign up for a platform like this one.
On the registration form, we can read that people can join the community as a male, female, couple, or cross-dresser. There are a lot of different options, which should guarantee an excellent experience.
It is not what it looks like
On the internet, we can find a lot of negative reviews left by former users of SeniorCrossdress.com. They include other websites run by the same operator, NetFanPix Ltd from Douglas, Isle of Man. Many complain about the presence of fantasy profiles which are created and controlled by fake chat operators.
In fact, in the Terms and Conditions, we find a partial confession of the rip-off. SeniorCrossdress.com admits using test profiles to allegedly enhance the quality of the services. But the real goal of these accounts is to trick the user into buying a VIP membership, without which they cannot respond to the incoming messages.
Here is an extract from the Terms and Conditions
From time to time, the Company employees (or employees of its parent or affiliated companies) may create test dating profiles for the purpose of checking and testing the functionality of our Website and Service to improve the quality and user experience for its Users.
The fake chat is not the only complaint from former users. Several people suggest that the VIP membership is also a scam, since it seems impossible to cancel. It looks like the company refuses to accept, without a valid reason, any request to terminate the contract, thus resulting in an expensive subscription trap.